My views

I am a Reactionary (including Reactionary liberal a la Charlie Kirk, J Bolonsaro, D Prager)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_good_constitutionalism

stupididpol

I agree with Marco Rubio’s 2019 critique of Capitalism

I am against Transgenderism erasing women/females.  Cisgender Women/females should always be called women/females and categorized as women/females and NOT be called or categorized as birthers.

Nowhere in the bible does it condemn people for being transgender and no one ever had any issues with people being Transgender in BC times, the Middle Ages, Victorian era etc

I also believe Climate Change has positive effects and may be a good thing: Warmer winters and thus fewer winter deaths, lower energy costs, better agricultural yields, fewer droughts, maybe richer biodiversity see this for more https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/are-there-positive-benefits-global-warming

I support economic egalitarianism , especially in Wages, Healthcare and Education that will help all people, including BIPOC+ but in this https://newrepublic.com/article/154996/myth-class-reductionism type of way https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1095796020913869. This is because these type of methods are better than race reductionist methods and are more inclusive than regular class reductionist methods

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/want-to-dismantle-capitalism-abolish-the-family/

equality that comes AFTER freedom, and Left Wing Meritocracy that is equal to freedom

said, SocDems have acknowledged the practical drawbacks of pursuing pure equality and the benefits of freedom as being very important. As such, they no longer pursue socialism.

LGBTQ

Personally and Legality wise, I support (and believe in) Traditional Marriage 

In the distant future, if the Left Wing Progressives, Liberals and Democrats turn on gays and say that being gay is wrong and that gay rights (including gay marriage) are wrong from a Left Wing, Liberal and Progressive perspective, in that hypothetical future, I would say "Personally, I oscillate between being indifferent lean objectivist and fifth political position on gay marriage"  

In the distant future, if the Left Wing Progressives, Liberals and Democrats turn on gays and say that being gay is wrong and that gay rights (including gay marriage) are wrong from a Left Wing, Liberal and Progressive perspective, in that hypothetical future, I would say "Legality wise, I begrudgingly and conditionally support gay marriage being legal"

Personally and Legality wise, I support homosexual males and lesbian females marrying each other 

I might become open to the idea of abolishing all marriages for everyone of all sexual orientations and making all marriages illegal for both straight couples and gay couples (since I support Queer Anarchism)  

I view the gay community of the 1970s, 1980s and early to mid 1990s as Joseph of Arimathea in the bible viewed Jesus during his life on Earth (and during his burial). I feel gays in the 1970s, 1980s and early to mid 1990s were cooler, less liberal and more content than the gays today. I love how they had their own little worlds back then

As it is now, I feel that ideally, in a different world, personally and legality wise gays should be able to do what they want to do (as long as it at least tries not to infringe of the rights of others), without discrimination and be happy. However, for better or worse, that is not the world we live in now. Until (and if) Liberals turn on gays and label being gay as Conservative (as noted above), I will continue to only support (and believe) in Traditional Marriage personally and legality wise

 I am tempted to say that I blindly sort of want gays to retroactively have the same rights and freedom from ‘discrimination’ in BC times through the late 20th century that gays in the US and Canada have now and in the future. My reason is, if being gay was and is always as accepted as being straight was and is always accepted, there wouldn't be any homophobes or anti gay resentment in the 20th century or 21st century and I would be more pro gay than I am now since in that world, being gay (like straight) would be seen as traditional

A ci

https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/patton-oswalt-apologizes-for-having-the-audacity-to-take-a-photo-with-dave-chappelle.4221294/

Migration

I support a system that fuses the US immigration system from the 1870s through the 1920s with a Path to Citizenship program for the millions of illegal immigrants already in the US  fr left 

I support a migration system which includes encouraging (in a humane way) more voluntary departures for illegal immigrants  fr left

Even though I am against illegal immigration, I do see illegal immigration as a silver lining in that it improves the US economy since undocumented migrants/illegal immigrants take up many jobs most Americans would never take.  Deporting millions of undocumented migrants/illegal immigrants isn't practical since many don't have homes to go back to or they would be worse off doing so. 

I support the red scare

 Reace-Ethnicity

All humans of all races and ethnicites are the same soul spirit eise

To my fellow anti wokers. If you were BIPOC+ or had a different history, home state or upbringing and you were active in politics in the 21st century, there is a chance you'd be a woke progressive too. So try to see woke things from the woke progressives' perspective as to not overreact to them. Have understanding toward them

I prefer the original Affirmative Action (which is instead of saying 'this job is open to any applicant' and then not making any efforts to find minority applicants, the bosses actively try to find minority applicants through definite actions) to modern day Affirmative Action (which is quota like)

I do support modern day Affirmative Action as a neccarry evil but I want color blind hiring and gender blind hiring to be set on a path to eventually replace modern day Affirmative Action/Quota hiring sooner rather than later. 

https://newdiscourses.com/2020/08/anti-racism-vs-liberalism/

I am tempted to say let (or even help) blacks outnumber us whites and take control of the US, so blacks can finally empathize with what us whites have gone through as the majority in the last few decades.

Once that happens, blacks will apologize for their wokeness, anti whiteness, reverse racism/prejudice and in return us whites can give them repartitions (like Larry Elder wants) 

If that doesn't happen, I will be fine with that.

The reason that I would be fine with blacks not empathizing with whites and not apologizing for offending whites after switching places with us, is because of the following.  It would mean that blacks as the majority race-ethnicity in power, would have avoided the wokeness, anti majority race-ethnicityness and reverse racism/prejudice that currently plague whites. 

So in a weird way, I'd get my wish of a non wokeness, and non reverse racism/non prejudice against the majority race-ethnicity in 'power' but with blacks instead of whites and thus, I'd just live vicariously through blacks

If blacks ever did outnumber whites (not that I believe that will happen in the next few centuries) and had what they perceived to be the 'power' in this country, in that hypothetical world, I would be fine and passive about them doing that, and I wouldn't be hostile toward them being the majority at all.

In that situation I'd be a Nationalist/Right Wing Nationalist (who happens to be white) who blurs the line of being a Nationalist/Right Wing Nationalist (who happens to be white) and something that is between a Western Chauvinist and Pro White. 

I'd try to help whites (and all people) to get their mind off of politics and to unite (like the Temptations tried to do in the US in the 1960s through their music)

However, if I was seeing racism by BIPOC+ toward whites (like in the South pre 1970s) or my rights were infringed upon by BIPOC+, in that hypothetical world, I'd upgrade to being something between an aloof ally and fifth column of something that is between pro white and what the Democrats and liberals falsely label as 'White Nationalism' (what the Democrats and liberals falsely label as 'White Nationalist' is someone who wants to prioritize white identity and white peoples' collective interest as a group without infringing on the rights of BIPOC. Sort of like a white version of the NAACP and LULAC, in a hypothetical future world where whites would be the minority and race and out of 'power') 

In this role as an aloof ally and fifth column of something between pro white and what the Democrats and liberals falsely label as 'White Nationalists', I would push White Nationalists to read this link https://web.archive.org/web/20220524210933/https://www.facinghistory.org/educator-resources/current-events/explainer/white-nationalism  so they can try to stop being White Nationalists and fix their problems the way the article says they should

I would probably in that hypothetical situation, also become a fusion of pitful and empathetic toward Left Wing Identity politics (like Mexican Nationalism)to offset that a bit (but I wouldn't support Left Wing Identity politics)

In the above hypothetical world, I'd reach out to blacks to try to form coalition to end the racism and unrest so I could go back to being what I am now in this world.

In that hypothetical world, if the above situation got worse and the majority of people in the US felt hated by blacks , whites or BIPOC, then I would recommend that as any oppressed people in the US go into space and colonize planets in other solar systems (like Europa, TOI 700 d , Enceladus, Kepler 1649c, Proxima Centauri b ) or even in other galaxies. But I'd still be non racist and peaceful toward whites, blacks and BIPOC+ as I am now

I like how equal and diverse Jonestown (Peoples Temple) was under Jim Jones. Obviously, the suicides and murders are indefensible as are the extreme and senseless abuse that kids endured there along with the other human rights violations committed at Jonestown.  Instead of mass murder and suicide, Jim Jones should have moved himself and the commune to the Soviet Union (while giving a plane ticket back to the states to anyone who didn't want to make the move and all people who were there with him involuntarily). Once there I would have wanted Jones and his commune to stop their human rights abuses and to live like the early Christians in the early book of Acts lived (while adopting pragmatic Christian Democratic ideologies fused with 1990s and 21sts century day Nordic political ideologies)

I belive the opoid epidemic is a myth

Int 

The ADL ,Christian Right and Catholic league along with SPLC, Bankers have too much power in our society. .They also smear people (Cath league with John Hagee) 

 I won’t condemn Andrew Torba for his bend the knee thing. It is religious organizations and interest groups of all denominations that have a loud voice not any one group of people

I am anti globalization

However I am not against the Manifest Destiny in the 19th century because it expanded our country and made it what it is today. If the US does a Manifest Destiny type of expansion to claim new lands in the future , I'd be compassionately open minded to half heartingly support that hypothetical future Manifest Destiny by the US while I note while supporting it that such acts are not really moral and pretty unhelpful.

the real culprits of the things that Jewish people were falsely accused of (and scapegoated for) are not the Jewish people, but Cosmopolitans (of all races-ethnicities and religions), Wall Street (of all races-ethnicities and religions), corrupt investors (of all races-ethnicities and religions) and Globalizationists (of all races-ethnicities and religions).  

We must in a peaceful but firm way counter those liberal and corrupt acts by Cosmopolitans (of all races-ethnicities and religions), Wall Street (of all races-ethnicities and religions), corrupt investors (of all races-ethnicities and religions) and Globalizationists (of all races-ethnicities and religions) . Once we do that, maybe they'll be on our side and help our cause.  Sort of like in my video games in the Defeat Means Friendship trope where video game enemies join your team when you defeat them (like in Fire Emblem Revelation when you defeat Nohr and Hoshido bosses and they join your team)

When Jesus comes he is going to convert all Jewish people who are faithful to the Torah to Christianity.

Since I wasn't alive during the Civil War, I was apolitical on the Civil War while it was happening 

In my current life, since birth and for the rest of my life, I retroactively side 1000% with the Union in the Civil War (just like the Lincoln Project people retroactively do), but in my previous life as a child in the 1970s, I was retroactively unconsciously fifth political position on who to side with in the Civil War

wmn 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Canada#Anti-abortion_movement

 abortion

IP

I am neutral to empathetic to Western Chauvinism.  I do view Western Chauvinism as annoying. Western Chauvinism might be a neccassary evil (due to the far left being extreme and due to Left Wing Identity politics) but Western Chavuinism should sooner rather than later be put on a path to eventually be phased out for Nationalism and eventually Western values Civic Nationalism.   

I am a Western values Civic Nationalist

I am a Republican/Conservative Values Identitarian 

Polemic

Let the Democrats get their way for accelerationism reasons .Like allowing a child who whines about not having enough candy to literally live at a Willy Wonka candy factory for a long time and the child getting so much candy while living there they never ask for candy again, give the Democrats literally everything  they want for a decade or more. Once people see how horrible a Democrat dream world is, it will destroy the Democrat Party and shift the overton window further right than it is now. We have to let Americans LIVE in the Democrats dream world for them to finally want the Democrats destroyed. To do that, let the Democrats literally have their way for a decade or more. ACCELERATIONISM

Our society is in RUINS. Our sick, disgusting society tolerates Satanists, is pro hard drug (according to fake polls) ,allows our kids to be exposed to drag queens, tries to force Christianity underground through fascist anti Christian laws where a coach can’t even pray after a game on the field, tries to force our kids to apologize for bring white, and is heading toward pure hell etc. Our society couldn’t be less anti God if we tried.

We cannot allow hard drugs to be legalized or decriminalized . We cannot allow Prostitution to be decriminalized or legalized (it should be illegal only for the buyer). We cannot allow Population Control to be legalized. If those things are decriminalized or legalized, our party is done and it means the Conservative movement has failed. We have to end this slippery sloping and I will end it. Gays, Marijuana, Hard Drugs, Prostitution, then Incest, Pedos then Beastality. I won’t allow it. 

What is the point of Conservatism if we can’t even win battles against drugs, Prostitution, Population Control. The RINO pigs in Oregon who allow hard drugs to be decriminalized or legalized, the RINO pigs in NYC who allow Prostitution to be decriminalized or legalized need to be taken out. They are useless, pawns for the Dummycrats. Those RINOs are worse than the Center Left

If hard drugs are decriminalized in multiple states or if Prostitution is legalized or decriminalized, I am starting a civil war to remedy this. If we don’t do it now it will get worse. Slippery sloping is real and if we don’t start a violent revolution against hard drugs and Prostitution, our country will die. Hard drugs and Prostitution have no place in our society. We must forced that trash to stay illegal. Do crime if need be to do this

 Abe Lincoln, Winfield Scott , and every U ion solider sould be on TeamJason in this Civil War, no doubt it.. Wenust take our country back

Democrats, Liberals and Progressives all force themselves to have the same views so they can label any views they don’t have as ‘Right wing’. This causes them to be able to stifle debate or cancel or censor simply by writing that said views are ‘right wing’ which delegitimizes the opposition. See this for more

Guns

Guns

Guns kill people but tyrants with gun monopolies kill the most